Parent Involvement: The Missing Key to Student Achievement

faow_02-14-00

For years, researchers like Dr. Joyce Epstein have advocated for increased parent involvement in schools as an obvious and important factor in increasing student achievement. Ask any teacher or administrator and they will agree. Parents are the first teacher students have, and quite often, the most important. There are numerous factors involved in why parents do or do not involve themselves in schools: ethnicity, employment status, education, family structure, etc. Of course, it is clear from research that increased parental involvement has a clear and positive impact on reading, mathematics, behavior, attendance and a significant drop in grade retention.

Researchers have identified some key roles of parental involvement: parent focused, school focused, and partnership focused. Parent focused involvement can be identified as parents having the primary responsibility of the education of their children. This can be problematic if there is a non-traditional parent structure such as a single parent, a grandparent/relative as caregiver, etc. However, parents generally agree that this is an important part of student development and is not to be taken lightly. Teachers and other education professionals see this role as empowering parents by giving them teaching roles (as if parents don’t already have this power but many may not be aware of how powerful a voice they can be in their children’s educations.

Read more »

Teacher Bar Exam? Really?

School Teacher

Most states, including California, already have a set procedure for assessing incoming educators, so do we need a national exam for teachers? Should all new teachers, nationwide, be expected to pass a form of the bar exam? Read the article and decide for yourself, however, I will state unequivocally that I am not entirely in favor of this proposal. I would rather see reform of the nations education colleges and a different method of bringing new teachers into the classrooms – perhaps long-term mentoring and team teaching. To sum up, we don’t need MORE standardized testing. We’ve already seen what that has done in the classroom.

Education union pitches ‘bar exam’ for incoming teachers | Fox News.

Parent Involvement or Parent Trigger?

Parent-Trigger-1

This year has been interesting in the so-called fight over education reform. It seems that in many areas, the concept of the parent trigger laws that are currently in nine states (and likely to expand) are en vogue. In fact, I wonder if any of my readers saw the movie Won’t Back Down – a movie that completely romanticizes parent trigger laws and also is complete fiction. I find myself considering parent trigger laws and also pondering what the laws seem to be missing or avoiding.

What are these laws missing? Responsibility. The lack of responsibility is not where you would expect to find it. I’m not talking about responsibility of schools and education leaders. I’m not talking about student responsibility or even legislative responsibility. I am talking about parent responsibility. Trigger laws do not require that parents actually involve themselves in their students education prior to “pulling the trigger.” Ask any educator and one of their top concerns about the school they work at is the lack of parent involvement.

If a teacher makes a phone call inviting a parent to come to a parent conference, and the parent does not come, who has failed? Suppose the school holds an open house and a small percentage of parents turn out. Imagine this same school labeled as failing. Theorize with me for a moment on this same school in regards to why this school is failing. Are teachers solely responsible for student learning? Are schools solely responsible? Are parents? In reality, everyone who is in the lives of our children is responsible for that learning.

Parent trigger laws give parents the ability to essentially close the school that is failing, but which law gives teachers the ability to close a failing school? I don’t see legislators running amok giving individual teachers the right to say their school is failing and remove staff or re-open as a charter. Don’t misunderstand me, I’m not advocating for this right because I believe that parent trigger laws are damaging and misplaced. What would happen if these laws included a provision where parents had to actually get involved? This provision might require that not just the small minority of parents is involved – but every parent is involved.

Should parents be involved in their children’s educations? Absolutely. Trigger laws do not solve problems, they create problems. Trigger laws don’t address issues such as poverty, ADHD, hunger, lack of home learning environments, or even bad teachers. Trigger laws are a knee jerk reaction to a larger problem that once change cannot fix. Every parent should be involved on some level with their children’s learning success. Parents pulling the trigger is not reform, it is neglect.

The Who, What, and Why of Adaptive Learning

images-9

Much has been said recently about adaptive learning and adaptive assessment. Essentially, adapted learning is a computer application that changes what is being learned and the method of learning based on a learners responses to previous questions. You may have used adaptive learning if you’ve ever used Khan Academy (not exactly adaptive but it is definitely student-paced which is a key quality of adaptive learning).

I ran across an article from the MIT Technology Review discussing adaptive learning so I decided to look a little further into the topic. It turns out, as unfortunately most things education related do these days, that adaptive technology means big money. I am talking super humongous big money (think Google – a pioneer in adaptive technology). Test prep companies like Knewton and Grockit are raising quite large sums of money to help bring their adaptive technology to a school or computer near you.

The question then is, why? Why is adaptive learning and any other kind of “test prep” technology important or useful at all? The answer is simple: SAT/GMAT/LSAT, etc. Our system of education changed forever in 1926 when The College Board first gave the SAT exam.

Don’t misunderstand me, I am not saying assessing student’s learning is wrong. We do need to know if our students are learning and if so, be able to measure it in order to help them achieve success in college and the workforce. I am not even against using adaptive technology. My only concern is that I want to know WHO is funding this movement, WHY they are funding it, and WHAT they expect to get out of it.

Answer these questions for me and I’ll be far more comfortable in using adaptive learning technology.

Read the article from Tom Simonite: (@tsimonite) Can Knewton’s Adaptive Learning Software Personalize Education? | MIT Technology Review.